Angry? Mad as hell and you can't take it anymore? Get something off your chest and it could be published online and/or in print. Bitches are anonymous and may be edited for length, grammar, spelling and our lenient standards of propriety.
Monday, January 28, 2008
All of you are bitches. All of you. Face facts. But seriously, think about it, are you not all bitches?
All of you are bitches. All of you. Face facts. But seriously, think about it, are you not all bitches?
The biggest bitch of them all
Shovel your sidewalks, you lazy lard-ass soyfuckers! I don’t care if it’s not your turn. I don’t care if your landlord is supposed to do it. I don’t care if the city sends a bobcat out to do your stretch. IT’S NOT ABOUT YOU, fuckwit! It’s about the peopl
Shovel your sidewalks, you lazy lard-ass soyfuckers! I don’t care if it’s not your turn. I don’t care if your landlord is supposed to do it. I don’t care if the city sends a bobcat out to do your stretch. IT’S NOT ABOUT YOU, fuckwit! It’s about the people who have to walk by your place, in particular, people pushing a stroller or bundle buggy; people with $10 boots with no tread; older people with weaker legs and god for-fucking-bid people who use a walker or wheelchair. Stop shovelling shit and start shovelling snow.
Helga, She-wolf of the SS
Why is it that people travelling on Herring Cove Road toward the Rotary (or, Round About-whatever) think that there is only one lane there in the morning, when CLEARLY both lanes inbound are open! I am sick and tired of people cutting me, my husband, an
Why is it that people travelling on Herring Cove Road toward the Rotary (or, Round About-whatever) think that there is only one lane there in the morning, when CLEARLY both lanes inbound are open! I am sick and tired of people cutting me, my husband, and our 3 year old off when they change lanes without signalling and nearly smash into my car because they aren't looking where they're going. TWO LANES, PEOPLE - NOT ONE BIG OL' LANE!!!!!!!!!!! Oh, and by the way, they BOTH go to Chebucto on the other side, so there's really no need to change in the first place if you're going that way. Jerks.
SJM
ok how obvious does it have to be that if you show up on a saturday morning unannounced you may catch someone doing ahem?! well my so called friend decided to show up unannounced. I sent her an email explaining that she should really call before coming i
ok how obvious does it have to be that if you show up on a saturday morning unannounced you may catch someone doing ahem?! well my so called friend decided to show up unannounced. I sent her an email explaining that she should really call before coming i'm not the only one in my house and it is the house rules! She basically trashed the friendship!! Over a request to call before you come? Wow I guess a 9 year friendship wasn't a friendship. fool me once shame on you fool me twice shame on me! I would think a friendship would respect the others request and vice versa! To the chick that did trash our friendship my advice is to take a look at yourself and how you handle relationships!
fooled once, not being fooled twice
To the bylaw enforcement officer who gave me the $222 ticket for have my harmless 12 year old, 30 pound mutt (that's 65 in human years - a senior citizen) off leash in the Commons and "at large" (though he is always not more than 10 feet in front of me).
To the bylaw enforcement officer who gave me the $222 ticket for have my harmless 12 year old, 30 pound mutt (that's 65 in human years - a senior citizen) off leash in the Commons and "at large" (though he is always not more than 10 feet in front of me). Good to see you have an eye out for dangerous animals.
Good on ya too the useless council who bring a blanket law in like this to criminalize lord knows how many more dog loving, council hating citizens.
Well at least I'm generating revenue for the cash strapped municipality for their other useless cat bylaw.
Needlessly Hounded
Good on ya too the useless council who bring a blanket law in like this to criminalize lord knows how many more dog loving, council hating citizens.
Well at least I'm generating revenue for the cash strapped municipality for their other useless cat bylaw.
Yesterday some bitch freaked out at a squeegee kid for yelling at his dog after it broke its leash and ran out into the road. The women threatened to call the SPCA and have his dog taken away (he didn’t lay a finger on his dog). At least these dogs aren’
Yesterday some bitch freaked out at a squeegee kid for yelling at his dog after it broke its leash and ran out into the road. The women threatened to call the SPCA and have his dog taken away (he didn’t lay a finger on his dog). At least these dogs aren’t locked in a stuffy house all day while their owners are at work. There is nothing like the loyalty and companionship that owning a dog gives, and these street kids deserve some love in their lives. To all who judge and don’t mind their own business, educate yourself on how these dogs really live before making someone else’s life harder.
—Pissed witness
Sunday, January 27, 2008
so the last couple of issues of the coast has focused the main article on things that are a waste of time Squegee kids? and the movie for How she move? come on now coast stop wasting your time and write better articles
so the last couple of issues of the coast has focused the main article on things that are a waste of time Squegee kids? and the movie for How she move? come on now coast stop wasting your time and write better articles
arg
Open letter to council on the proposal to amend the bylaw to allow a 19 story building on South Park and Brenton.We have several concerns about the bylaw amendment in Case 01046, in particular: 1. The HRMbyDesign Project has already recommended a ma
Open letter to council on the proposal to amend the bylaw to allow a 19 story building on South Park and Brenton.
We have several concerns about the bylaw amendment in Case 01046, in particular:
1. The HRMbyDesign Project has already recommended a maximum building height of 116 feet for this area. This proposal was based on maintaining the beauty and integrity of the Halifax peninsula in order to benefit everyone rather than on benefitting the narrow interests of a condominium developer. The WM Fares group has offered no public good that can be obtained from adding an extra 6 to 8 stories to the HRMbyDesign recommendation.
2. We already have two precedents that are relevant to this case: Fenwick Tower and the Aliant building. Those who live and work on the Halifax peninsula view both of these buildings as eyesores which not only mar the natural beauty of the peninsula but also inhibit views of the harbour. There is no reason to repeat these mistakes. These buildings also demonstrate that once this building has been constructed it will be with us for a very long time. Do we really want another Fenwick Tower on the Halifax peninsula?
3. Property prices, particularly condominium prices, are already falling on the Halifax peninsula due to the glut of condominiums that has resulted from the construction over the last several years. An enormous building such as this will only further contribute to this glut, producing extra units that nobody will want or need for years to come. This again brings to mind the disaster that was and is Fenwick Tower.
4. Finally, should this building be constructed at 19 stories as suggested, it could easily become the beginning of a trend that will result in the beauty of the Halifax peninsula becoming transformed into the hideousness of the island of Manhattan. Is this truly a road that we wish to begin to travel down?
In conclusion, to amend this bylaw in favor of such a large building is a decision which does not benefit the people of Halifax; it only benefits WM Fares. This amendment proposes to add 6 extra floors of condominium units that the public neither wants nor needs, as witnessed by the large number of units currently for sale in the recently completed Martello building. Thus, we will be permanently destroying the Maritime beauty of our peninsula for no reason whatsoever. The 116 feet height recommended by the HRMbyDesign Project is clearly quite adequate and if WM Fares claims that such a building is not profitable for them to build, then they should consider building elsewhere.
There is a public meeting regarding this issue December 5th at 7pm at the Prince George Hotel. Please attend if you have concerns.
Concerned resident
We have several concerns about the bylaw amendment in Case 01046, in particular:
1. The HRMbyDesign Project has already recommended a maximum building height of 116 feet for this area. This proposal was based on maintaining the beauty and integrity of the Halifax peninsula in order to benefit everyone rather than on benefitting the narrow interests of a condominium developer. The WM Fares group has offered no public good that can be obtained from adding an extra 6 to 8 stories to the HRMbyDesign recommendation.
2. We already have two precedents that are relevant to this case: Fenwick Tower and the Aliant building. Those who live and work on the Halifax peninsula view both of these buildings as eyesores which not only mar the natural beauty of the peninsula but also inhibit views of the harbour. There is no reason to repeat these mistakes. These buildings also demonstrate that once this building has been constructed it will be with us for a very long time. Do we really want another Fenwick Tower on the Halifax peninsula?
3. Property prices, particularly condominium prices, are already falling on the Halifax peninsula due to the glut of condominiums that has resulted from the construction over the last several years. An enormous building such as this will only further contribute to this glut, producing extra units that nobody will want or need for years to come. This again brings to mind the disaster that was and is Fenwick Tower.
4. Finally, should this building be constructed at 19 stories as suggested, it could easily become the beginning of a trend that will result in the beauty of the Halifax peninsula becoming transformed into the hideousness of the island of Manhattan. Is this truly a road that we wish to begin to travel down?
In conclusion, to amend this bylaw in favor of such a large building is a decision which does not benefit the people of Halifax; it only benefits WM Fares. This amendment proposes to add 6 extra floors of condominium units that the public neither wants nor needs, as witnessed by the large number of units currently for sale in the recently completed Martello building. Thus, we will be permanently destroying the Maritime beauty of our peninsula for no reason whatsoever. The 116 feet height recommended by the HRMbyDesign Project is clearly quite adequate and if WM Fares claims that such a building is not profitable for them to build, then they should consider building elsewhere.
There is a public meeting regarding this issue December 5th at 7pm at the Prince George Hotel. Please attend if you have concerns.
I was at the last Songwriter's Circle. There was a couple close to the stage who talked all through the show, they were loud and obnoxious. They were obviously drunk. It is an acoustic show. Why are there no ushers or someone to tell these people to be q
I was at the last Songwriter's Circle. There was a couple close to the stage who talked all through the show, they were loud and obnoxious. They were obviously drunk. It is an acoustic show. Why are there no ushers or someone to tell these people to be quiet!!?!?!??
fan
Saturday, January 26, 2008
The IWK is suppose o be a children's and well women hospital. The dirt in this place is disgusting!! Everywhere dirt, not just normal everyday mes but fiflth!! Pleas someone clean the plae up. There are sick people trying to get better. They will be luck
The IWK is suppose o be a children's and well women hospital. The dirt in this place is disgusting!! Everywhere dirt, not just normal everyday mes but fiflth!! Pleas someone clean the plae up. There are sick people trying to get better. They will be lucky to not pick up some other form of sickness from the disgust in there!!!!
so disappointed in the IWK